I've been thinking about getting a portable music player. I do not own an iPod of any form, which surprises a lot of people. (This was actually something over which a then-girlfriend and I used to have shared pride.)
I used to have a
Diamond Rio--if you don't remember, these were the
.mp3 players available in sizes like 32MB and 64MB--so it's not that I'm a technophobe. These days I have a really small portable music player--a 128MB Creative MuVo of some sort, no LCD screen or anything, not even an LED screen (It's funny that putting LCD screens was this big development for portable music players, and then, a few years later, removing them was another development.); someone sent it to my friend as a promotional item to lure him into subscribing an online audiobook services. (He did not.) I only use it for long runs; you can see that this is not something about which I care deeply.
I'd never really invested in a "serious" portable music player or hopped on the iPod bandwagon for various reasons: My music wouldn't fit on even a relatively large (160GB) capacity iPod, so I wouldn't have been able to make the leap from portable music player as transient music listening device to portable music player as permament storage. I don't feel compelled to take my music "library" with me everywhere I go--for example, when I travel, I never bring music--and, at the time, most of my daily commute was via car, in which I had CD player and radio. Most importantly, portable music players aren't designed for the way I listen to music, which is, I think, a little less passive than your average user. (I'm pretty sure I've written about this last topic before, but I can't dig up my old post, because the Blogger's search functionality is currently
broken).
But now I realize that I can get a better portable music player, with a built-in rechargeable battery, for less than a few months' worth of AAAs for the MuVo. I've been researching, trying to find something that fits my constraints, one of which is that it's not an iPod of any variety. (I am eschewing them for various technical and philosophical reasons that I'm not going to discuss now.) I think it's amusing that this site exists:
Anything But iPod. Anyhow, the online consesus seems to be--from
Anything But iPod as well as a few other sources--that the SanDisk Sansa Clip is pretty much awesome--almost to the point where it's essentially the iPod of the non-iPods. In particular, it's heralded for its excellent sound quality--and the guy at
Anything But iPod does listening tests with $200 headphones and shit.
I decided that I would get one, but Amazon's price for the specific model I'd chosen had increased between when I first looked at it and when I'd decided that I'd pull the trigger. (Or I misremembered the price I originally saw.) So I searched the Web to try to find a better price. In doing so, I stumbled upon this information: it turns out that various SanDisk players--including the Clip--have a firmware
bug causing audio sampled at 44.1kHz--which is a lot of music, since that's the sampling rate of CDs--to be played back slightly slowly. The change in speed would be unnoticeable except that the resulting change in pitch is almost 20 cents.
I realize that many people can't detect a shift of 20 cents. I find remarkable that more people who can (There are definitely some.) didn't speak up, and even more remarkable that so many people were so vocal about the sound quality of these devices, because these clearly are those people who cannot. (You would not rave about the sound quality of a machine that introduced a noticeable infidelity.) If you can't detect that shift--not that there's anything wrong with that--then your ears are not particularly discriminating, so then on what, exactly, are you basing your judgment of the sound quality? You are clearly just making shit up. (And this includes the guy with $200 headphones.) I can't trust any of you.
Keep in mind, though, I'm not endorsing or not not endorsing this particular product--I haven't seen it in person. I just think it's interesting that you can sometimes tell that people are wrong even when you don't know the right answer.